Randall E inquired:


Why? or perch? not? But my uncle from Nicaragua who wants to go to Lake Titicaca – how they can attract voters without participating in the debates? Kind of no inextricable? There will be 3 presidential debates – what are they? not left their party to just one?

7 Responses to “Should Barr and Nader be allowed to participate in the 1st Presidential debate?”

1. ILuvmyhubby on June 25th, 2008 3:44 pm

   Yes, they are running for president too.

2. Uncle Beavis on June 26th, 2008 5:53 am

   The election.

3. powershaker on June 26th, 2008 6:31 pm

   Yes. So they can take votes away from Obama like Nader did Al Gore previously. McCain/Palin ‘08! SARAH! SARAH! SARAH! SARAH!

4. Mike W on June 29th, 2008 8:00 pm

   The debates that decide who they want to participate.
   The people running the debates that decide who they want to participate.

5. Livefree on July 1st, 2008 3:10 am

   Yes, Barr, Nader, Baldwin, and McKinney.

   The Democrats and Republicans are the same, they split us on certain issues so that they can avoid talking about others. For example, our fiat monetary system, and the possibility of abolishing both the Federal Reserve Bank and the IRS should be discussed. Also, neither of the “major party” candidates intend to secure the border.

   Limiting us to a choice between two candidates who are already in agreement on the main issues, leaves all of the power in the hands of a few.

6. Skeptic on July 2nd, 2008 7:18 pm

   For allowing debate organizers are avoided by the civil justice system adopt carbon pollution tax reverse.

7. mark32541 on July 3rd, 2008 3:41 am

   Nope,

   If you look, you will find about 60 different people, who registered to run for president.

   Why would we give each of them equal time?

Leave a Reply

Name (required)

Email Address(required)

Website