<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why are the Republican candidates unwilling to participate in a &#8220;YouTube&#8221; debate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hopkinsdebate.com/why-are-the-republican-candidates-unwilling-to-participate-in-a-youtube-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hopkinsdebate.com/why-are-the-republican-candidates-unwilling-to-participate-in-a-youtube-debate/</link>
	<description>Debates, Opinions and Discussions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 01:30:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: boredwithyou</title>
		<link>http://hopkinsdebate.com/why-are-the-republican-candidates-unwilling-to-participate-in-a-youtube-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>boredwithyou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 03:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hopkinsdebate.com/why-are-the-republican-candidates-unwilling-to-participate-in-a-youtube-debate/#comment-110</guid>
		<description>The democrapic party.
For debate then again this whole horde of the democrapic party.
For debate then again this whole horde of the primary on both sides is pretty moronic forum for debate then again this whole horde of candidates in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The democrapic party.<br />
For debate then again this whole horde of the democrapic party.<br />
For debate then again this whole horde of the primary on both sides is pretty moronic forum for debate then again this whole horde of candidates in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1st Buzie</title>
		<link>http://hopkinsdebate.com/why-are-the-republican-candidates-unwilling-to-participate-in-a-youtube-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>1st Buzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hopkinsdebate.com/why-are-the-republican-candidates-unwilling-to-participate-in-a-youtube-debate/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>They are not circus performers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are not circus performers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://hopkinsdebate.com/why-are-the-republican-candidates-unwilling-to-participate-in-a-youtube-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 22:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hopkinsdebate.com/why-are-the-republican-candidates-unwilling-to-participate-in-a-youtube-debate/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know! Why are Democrats so unwilling to participate in a debate sponsored by Fox News? Are they afraid to take questions which will reach a predominantly conservative audience? It&#039;s politics plain and simple. I am sure that many Republican candidates have not embraced the Internet fully yet and consider it a haven for liberals. I mean let&#039;s be honest most are old white stuffed shirts who are indeed slow to respond and change with the times. I could be wrong on this, but it seems like as plausible an explanation as any that might be presented.

Edit: I am not a boot licker. Unlike yourself I don&#039;t kiss any party&#039;s hindquarters. I vote for people not party agendas. Second, I don&#039;t watch Fox News. However,  it is a news outlet. Want to argue it is biased that is fine, because I would agree with you there. They do have a large audience though. If Democrats want to attempt to win over these votes they would make the attempt to reach them by whatever means are necessary. 

How do you spin a debate? And if you even try it would be so patently obvious as to be laughable and would prove beyond a shadow of doubt how biased Fox is on matters which would add support to their claims. Like the  Democrats in question, you are short sighted and cannot see the big picture. You just attack anything you don&#039;t agree with out of hand (i.e. Boot Licker comment) . Get over yourself pal and before you talk about anything, or anyone being biased, take a good long look in the mirror, because your presumptions about my political leanings without supporting evidence show how biased you are on matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know! Why are Democrats so unwilling to participate in a debate sponsored by Fox News? Are they afraid to take questions which will reach a predominantly conservative audience? It&#8217;s politics plain and simple. I am sure that many Republican candidates have not embraced the Internet fully yet and consider it a haven for liberals. I mean let&#8217;s be honest most are old white stuffed shirts who are indeed slow to respond and change with the times. I could be wrong on this, but it seems like as plausible an explanation as any that might be presented.</p>
<p>Edit: I am not a boot licker. Unlike yourself I don&#8217;t kiss any party&#8217;s hindquarters. I vote for people not party agendas. Second, I don&#8217;t watch Fox News. However,  it is a news outlet. Want to argue it is biased that is fine, because I would agree with you there. They do have a large audience though. If Democrats want to attempt to win over these votes they would make the attempt to reach them by whatever means are necessary. </p>
<p>How do you spin a debate? And if you even try it would be so patently obvious as to be laughable and would prove beyond a shadow of doubt how biased Fox is on matters which would add support to their claims. Like the  Democrats in question, you are short sighted and cannot see the big picture. You just attack anything you don&#8217;t agree with out of hand (i.e. Boot Licker comment) . Get over yourself pal and before you talk about anything, or anyone being biased, take a good long look in the mirror, because your presumptions about my political leanings without supporting evidence show how biased you are on matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracer</title>
		<link>http://hopkinsdebate.com/why-are-the-republican-candidates-unwilling-to-participate-in-a-youtube-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hopkinsdebate.com/why-are-the-republican-candidates-unwilling-to-participate-in-a-youtube-debate/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>It will happen. Give them a few months to catch up culturally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will happen. Give them a few months to catch up culturally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gers_hooligan</title>
		<link>http://hopkinsdebate.com/why-are-the-republican-candidates-unwilling-to-participate-in-a-youtube-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>gers_hooligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hopkinsdebate.com/why-are-the-republican-candidates-unwilling-to-participate-in-a-youtube-debate/#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Well Giuliani, McCain, Romney and Paul would get most time. The lower guys(Huckabee, Tancredo, Brownback, Thompson, etc.)  should do it to help themselves, but its a waste of time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Giuliani, McCain, Romney and Paul would get most time. The lower guys(Huckabee, Tancredo, Brownback, Thompson, etc.)  should do it to help themselves, but its a waste of time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

