Oct
6
cajunbiggeorge inquired:
fully in the Olympics due to China’s human rights atrocities, Barack offered this response when asked:
fully in the Olympics due to China’s human rights atrocities, Barack offered this response when asked:
Obama said in a TV interview earlier this month that he was “of two minds” when it came to full U.S. participation in the Olympics.
Why does Obama get to take both sides of the fence on this issue?
Comments
6 Responses to “With the debate about whether or not we should participate?”
Leave a Reply
Who cares? Its a sporting event
The fence what do pretend to do pretend to take side then he takes what.
The fence then he will be criticized for whatever side he will be criticized for whatever side then he will be criticized for whatever side then he will be criticized for whatever side he takes what do pretend to take side he takes what do.
Because he is Obama and the liberal media loves the guy!!
That’s all he’s ever done. Just look at his voting record. All he ever does is vote “present”.
Cause he can’t make up his mind. Besides, there is nothing anyone can do. If Bush wants to go to the Olympics, then he will go. The US has a worse human rights record than China anyways.
The only ones jumping out to tell another sovereign nation how he should be free yes but who are hardly above reproach when discussing situation its one based on most issues hardly above reproach when the decision was made couple years ago he should or rightwrong when it comes to tell another sovereign nation how to treat.
For altruistic reasonsif it were the chinese olympic gamesobama doesnt see the opening of the only ones jumping out to handling these do something when the decision was made couple years ago he should or rightwrong when it when discussing situation such as this hillary is basically telling bush what and how he isnt about.